Projects

Project outline

The overall goal is that long-term biodiversity conservation and sustainable use by indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) is better recognised, supported, scaled up and embedded in all aspects of the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. It will strengthen local level actions of IPLCs in six countries for self-determined sustainable land and resource governance and biodiversity conservation, ensuring the development and piloting of local approaches. It builds on local experience to engage national level actors to create an enabling environment for scaling up support to local contributions to biodiversity as part of achieving global and national Aichi targets. It combines this with effective partnerships and mechanisms for full participation of IPLCs in National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAP) processes at national level and global Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) processes, including monitoring and reporting. It draws lessons from local and national experiences to disseminate at regional and global levels.

Objectives

The overall goal of this project will be achieved through work in six partner countries and at regional and global levels:

(i) IP&LCs undertake local initiatives for self-determined land and resource governance for biodiversity conservation, sustainable use and benefit-sharing

(ii) Development of new national partnerships and enabling measures to support the above

(iii) Development of effective partnerships and accessible mechanisms for full and equitable participation of IPLCs in NBSAP processes and in global CBD processes

(iv) Documentation, exchange, analysis and wider dissemination of lessons learned at local, national and global levels

ICCS’s role in the project

ICCS is approaching this project from both sides of the spectrum- by working with project partners to increase the capacity of indigenous peoples and local communities, and working to increase skills and awareness amongst conservation professionals. We are:

  1. We have developed, piloted and tailored a set of innovative tools and approaches to monitor biodiversity, with input from partners and communities. For more details, see our four guidance documents for community-based organisations.
  2. In collaboration with Forest Peoples Programme, we have provided training and are accompanying in-country partner organisations in participatory biodiversity monitoring using CoMapeo (https://comapeo.app/. We have been working mainly with the Ogiek of Mount Elgon in Kenya, who have designed data collection protocols informed by their traditional knowledge and using scientific methodologies including line transects, vegetation quadrats and camera traps. We are also working with communities in northern Thailand through Inter Mountain Peoples’ Education and Culture in Thailand Association (IMPECT) as well as with the Autonomous Territorial Government of the Wampis Nation in Amazonian Peru.
  3. Based on the data collected during monitoring, we have supported our indigenous partners to demonstrate their contributions to biodiversity conservation to external audiences, including national governments.
  4. We have also developed guidance for conservation professionals on the relationship between conservation and human rights.
  5. We are opening spaces for indigenous peoples to share their perspectives to a conservation audience through strategic publications and presentations.

Project outputs

Guidance documents for communities

All our guidance documents can be found here: Transformative Pathways Guidance Documents – ICCS.

 

Peer-reviewed publications

Please see below.

‘Participatory’ conservation research involving indigenous peoples and local communities: Fourteen principles for good practice – ScienceDirect

Conservation policy is shifting to a greater focus on rights and equity, and supporting this shift is a rational next step for conservation science.

Key themes include procedural, methodological and ethical aspects of participation. We present 14 principles for good practice to participation in research. Together, they provide a novel framework for equity into conservation research.

iccs-image

Brittain, S.Alatorre, A.Bullough, L.-A., & Newing, H. (2026). Enabling conditions for conservation on Indigenous and community lands – Society for Conservation Biology. Conservation Biology40, e70055

There is an increasing evidence and general acceptance in global environmental policy that Indigenous Peoples and local communities play a large role in biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation.

However, an implementation gap exists between this acknowledgement, and on-the-ground realities. This paper aims to understand this discrepancy, and potential conditions that may help to support the contributions of Indigenous Peoples and local communities to conservation.

Newing, H., Fisher, M., Brittain, S., Kenrick, J., & Milner-Gulland, E. (2023). How can we advance equitable, rights-based conservation? Oryx, 57(3), 273-274.

This paper was part of a special issue on human rights and conservation. Another paper in this issue, ‘We are our land – Ogiek of Mount Elgon, Kenya: securing community tenure as the key enabling condition for sustaining community lands‘ focuses on one of the sites we are working at through the Transformative Pathways project.

iccs-image

Milner-Gulland EJ (2024) Now is the time for conservationists to stand up for social justice. PLoS Biol 22(6): e3002657. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002657

iccs-image